Expand on patlet/problem of Modular Code Pattern#293
Merged
Conversation
spier
added
the
📖 Type - Content Work
spier
requested review from
NewMexicoKid,
cewilliams and
lenucksi
as code owners
Member
Author
|
@NewMexicoKid I was wondering if you could help to review this, as you were part of the original authors? |
spier
added
the
1-initial
NewMexicoKid
approved these changes
Mar 21, 2022
Collaborator
NewMexicoKid
left a comment
NewMexicoKid
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change looks fine (different organizations might have management or developers in a responsible role as mentioned in the patlets). Engineering is a nice phrase that encompasses both.
Member
Author
|
Note to self @spier : |
Member
Author
Done |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
After merging #95 I noticed that the summary in the README does not fit to the problem statement in the pattern.
Summary in README.md:
Problem statement in pattern:
What now?
To get both in-sync, I started to elaborate on both patlet and problem section of this pattern.
If anybody could help here, that would be awesome.
TODO